Proceedings
Proceedings from national and international scientific conferences in the agricultural sciences.
For Reviewers
Papers in the proceedings undergo double-blind peer review by members of the editorial board or invited specialists with expertise in the relevant scientific area.
Review Process
- Each paper is evaluated by two independent reviewers
- Reviewers remain anonymous to the authors
- The review period is 21 calendar days
- Reviews follow a structured evaluation form
Evaluation Criteria
- Scientific originality and contribution
- Quality of methodology and analysis
- Relevance to the conference theme
- Linguistic and stylistic correctness
Applications to join the reviewer panel:csb@agriacad.bg